Election Day is upon us
May 6, 2008
USEFUL ELECTION LINKS
• Lee County Election Results (will begin posting around 8 p.m.)
• Election Results by other counties
• North Carolina’s Obama/Clinton results and other statewide races
Election Day Blog:
12:15 p.m.: Front page is done. Reporters are gone. Another election come and gone. Only got one more this year.
Here’s Wednesday’s front page. Good night everybody.
10 p.m.: Well, now’s the time we really get to work on the newspaper … but here are a few of my thoughts …
• I’m really surprised the sales tax failed, only because I thought it was a good campaign to get it passed. Turns out, people don’t like taxes, and it was an uphill battle all the way. Interested to see what the school board and county commissioners’ next move is.
• Cameron Sharpe was the only “challenger” to get on the school board, but Kim Lilley lost out to Bill Tatum by just a few votes. I’m not sure if the voters were trying to say something about Bill … but that was probably too close for his comfort. I’m wondering how the write-in campaigns affected this race.
• Chairman Bob Brown will not make it to the November election, which may also be a wake-up call to current Democrats on the Lee County Board of Commissioners.
My next post will come in the next hour. I’ve gotta get to work on the paper.
9:58 p.m.: COMPLETE RESULTS IN FOR LEE COUNTY. Here they are below:
LEE COUNTY
(9 of 9 precincts reporting)
‘For’ or ‘against’ a .25-cent increase in the Lee County Sales Tax
For —— 44.7% (5.728 votes)
*Against —— 55.32% (7,092 votes)
Candidates for Lee County Board of Commissioners at large nomination (vote for three):
*Jerry Lemmond —— 22.29%
*Richard Hayes —— 22.15%
*“Ed” Paschal —— 20.23%
Bob Brown —— 19.06%
Wade Childress —— 16.27%
Lee County Board of Education (vote for four):
*Lynn Smith —— 19.55%
*Shawn Williams —— 17.15%
*Cameron Sharpe —— 16.13%
*W.P. “Bill” Tatum —— 14.76% (5,715 votes)
Kimberly Lilley —— 14.42% (5,583 votes)
Mark Akinosho —— 12.06%
Write-ins —— 5.93%
9:31 p.m.: Five of nine precincts reporting … go to the Herald’s blog site to see the results.
My thoughts so far:
• It still looks bad for the sales tax, but not insurmountable.
• It looks better for Bill Tatum, who’s currently in fourth for the school board (4 get in). Kim Lilley and Mark Akinosho (as well as the write-in candidates) trail.
• Lee County Chairman Bob Brown doesn’t look like he’ll move on to the election this year. That’s gotta be disappointing for him. I would have blamed his teetering on the school tax issue, but seeing the tax fail right now, I’m just not sure anymore.
• Side note, Hillary Clinton’s winning Lee County by a good margin. Looks like Bill’s visit worked … at least here.
9:25 p.m.: Just learned that nothing will be posted to the state election Web site until all nine precincts report. To me, this is crap. But oh well.
Thankfull, we have R.V. Hight on the scene … and this is what he’s given me so far:
On the sales tax, with 2 precincts and the early voting,
For: 2,721
Against: 3,250
Not looking good for the tax, but it’s likely the portion of Sanford where students go to Lee County High School hasn’t reported yet (I know one of the reporting precincts sends students to Southern Lee). So we shall see.
9:14 p.m.: Barack Obama’s making his victory speech in North Carolina. He just congratulated Clinton for a win in Indiana … but today can’t be good for Clinton. She did a ton of campaigning here, and it looks like Obama completely stomped her here.
Sorry Bill.
9:08 p.m.: No results are posted, but this is what I’m getting from RV Hight.
From early voting and the Southern Lee County district:
• Looks like the sales tax referendum is ‘getting beaten pretty good.’
• Bill Tatum is finishing well behind in early voting and in the one precinct that has reported. The leaders so far are Shawn Williams, Lynn Smith, Cameron Sharpe and Kim Lilley. Again, this is just early voting and one district.
• He said these are just ‘early looks,’ but on the commissioner race, Chairman Bob Brown was in fourth place in early voting (top 3 get in), and he was fifth in the Southern Lee County precinct.
9 p.m.: It’s 9 p.m. and no results yet … though now I’m hearing after early voting, the sales tax is trailing, Cameron Sharpe is leading on school board and Richard Hayes is leading for the commissioner. Just what I’m hearing. Nothing official.
8:10 p.m.: The calm before the storm. Food has been ordered though. So that’s exciting.
No results in from Lee County yet … but a little birdy has told me the sales tax is expected to pass.
7:31 p.m.: One minute after the polls closed, Barack Obama declared winner in North Carolina. Luckily, I saw this coming … though it does look like Hillary will win Indiana.
6:10 p.m.: Just saw FoxNews talking about Clinton’s “small town visits” in North Carolina. The reporter said: “Stopping in towns with few, if any, stoplights.”
I know Sanford falls under the “small town” category, but last I checked, we have too many stoplights.
Don’t you love it when the ‘city folk’ come a callin’ in our backyards, ma?
6:03 p.m.: In one hour, one of the most important parts of election night will be upon us … the delivery call.
Last year’s Chinese food experiment was so popular, we’re throwing that in with the free pizza coupons we got.
So tonight, it’s Pizza and Chinese. Is it any wonder journalists rarely make it out of the 50s?
5:40 p.m.: Well, it’s been about two hours since my last post, and it’s been a lightning fast two hours filled with “mapping” today’s paper. Yes, at 5:30, the entire Election section of today’s paper is practically laid out. It’s all about filling in the blanks now. That’s called PLANNING, fellas.
On a side note, my dad and my stepmom visited me last night and today, and we had a great time together, although it was short (he’s on his way to visit my grandparents in Ohio). He got a new car — a Saturn Sky — and I got to test drive it yesterday with the top down.
I want a convertible now.
3:40 p.m.: Election Day has always been a hectic day for us … but it’s also kind of like a “finish line” for newsroom employees. You see, we do a lot of work making sure coverage is fair (even though nobody thinks it is) and all of our bases are covered … and by the time today comes, we’re exhausted.
Some of you, however, may be wondering why I haven’t blogged much about the election — save a few obama/clinton posts and a lot about Bill Clinton’s visit. The reason is this: I love politics, but I can’t stand arguing with some of the knuckleheads on both sides.
As a newspaper editor, I get a lot of flack from people who criticize us for not reporting on alleged election sign malfeasance (happens EVERY year). Every time a sign appears in a yard it wasn’t supposed to be in, we’re expected to do a front page story. Well, guess what, it’s not news. If the sign actually got up on its own and went to that yard, then MAYBE it’s a story.
And this year, I’ve been inundated with e-mails from Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton’s camps. I get about 40 e-mails a day combined from the two, and that doesn’t count what I’m getting from the senate and governor candidates. I don’t read most of them unless the subject line grabs me. They rarely grab me.
What is funny to me, however, is the way our newspaper (and newspapers in general) is perceived by the aforementioned knuckleheads. Last November, we were the cigar-smoking staunch conservative newspaper that only supported tax-hating white male Republicans. This year, we’re the tree-hugging, tax-loving, Bill Clinton-adoring Democrats, according to the people who were “on our side” in November.
It’s all about perception, I suppose, but it all goes to show that this newspaper (I’m not speaking for all of them) makes its decisions based on reporting the news, researching the news and lots and lots and lots of discussion. We’re not the robots many would wish we were. We’re also not the evil machine many think we are.
Luckily, I’m thick-skinned and there’s little that can be said that will raise the hair on my back.
But now you know why I don’t talk politics much on here. I don’t like arguing with people who aren’t willing to listen.
3 p.m.: Well, I’ve voted today (at Deep River Elementary, which was my first visit to the school … very nice). I won’t tell you who I voted for (or which primary I voted in), but I will say it’s always refreshing to vote for races that I know a lot about. I can’t always say that’s been the case in the past. There were a few races I didn’t know much about, but even those, I heard of the candidates or saw their TV ads.
Entry Filed under: Politics, Sanford. Tags: election, Lee County, North Carolina, results, school board.
13 Comments Add your own
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed



1.
mylesfromnowhere | May 6, 2008 at 5:26 pm
man when it is all done it is going to be so anti climactic
2.
David Nestor | May 7, 2008 at 1:03 am
Any idea what the hold up is?
3.
jayriley | May 7, 2008 at 1:17 am
Chads.
4.
jayriley | May 7, 2008 at 1:18 am
… and Ruths & Johns
5.
villa | May 7, 2008 at 1:46 am
i cannot believe the sales tax is losing…some people do not get it.
6. Newspaper Endorsements…Do They Work? « B3’s Blog | May 7, 2008 at 1:56 am
[...] we “got it right” this year or if we blew it. (See Billy Liggett’s blog posting here to read his take on a similar [...]
7.
villa | May 7, 2008 at 2:01 am
lee county blew it…needed that sales tax increase…
8.
Joe Jon | May 7, 2008 at 3:11 am
How refreshing that the majority of Lee County citizens recognized another bad tax for what it is! We are indeed NOT under taxed!
9.
Eric | May 7, 2008 at 5:01 am
Great layout on that front page! Very impressive.
I wonder about those who voted against the sales tax as well. Kinda funny how people want good goverment service, educational facilities, etc and think it should be free…. You should see how people complain about how dreary the DMV is but then the complain about when we have to pay more taxes. You get what you pay for… Think there are a lot of fluff in county budget? I encourage everyone to actually read it when it comes out.
10.
Tammy Hebert | May 8, 2008 at 12:36 pm
Isn’t it ironic that the sales tax was defeated in the precints that already got their kids moved to a nice new school – not one but two new schools. So, basically since we all had our property taxes raised to build their “nice new schools” they didn’t see it proper to raise a tax for everyone so we could fix our old school. Sounds very snobbish to me.
Maybe we should all find Lee Senior unfit for students to use then put them all over at Southern and watch how fast that school falls apart. Wonder how quick they’d pass a tax to fix their lovely school.
This pisses me off…because this needs to be done and the sales tax was a fair way to do it. I am tired being a property owner and paying for everything that the majority of non-property owners use but don’t have to pay for
How stupid Lee County is – we not only took upon ourselves to fix the one thing that is most important for all areas – schools but we were the only ones dumb enough to pick Hillary..ick. Thank goodness I am not a democrat.
11.
Tammy Hebert | May 8, 2008 at 6:39 pm
Here’s an idea. When we lived in Texas they had the taxes broken down into two areas. Everyone paid property taxes on their house but then there was a seperate school tax. It was based on the tax appraised value of your home and it went directly to the schools your house was zoned for. We had Wichita County broken down into 3 school districts. The districts had the power to vote in their school tax on what percentage they needed or wanted. We lived in Burkburnett School District and it was by no means the expensive – country club district. It was basically farm land and then subdivisions that bordered the base and then a town farther out. It was funny as the town of Wichita Falls that held very high homes and had the country club had very low school taxes and it showed but we had higher ones and it showed. Our kids schools were high in technology and had all the educational things they needed. WE built schools before they were terribly overcrowded and we had money for sports.
Our little $90,000.00 house paid over $2200 a year in school taxes but our friends who lived in Country Club in a $330,000.00 house only paid $900.00 in taxes.
Believe me you get what you pay for and they envied our schools.
So, maybe we need to break up this school district and let those of us who are willing to accept the taxes who have paid our property tax increase to fund two new schools that didn’t help our students at all will fund our children’s needs.
Seems only fair – let us pay for our children’s futures since some others don’t want to help after they have been helped.
I can say the last property increase did nothing for my children’s education.
B
B
NN
12.
Jeff S. | May 9, 2008 at 2:52 am
Maybe it’s me, but the 15 minutes I spend in the DMV offices every six years don’t exactly leave me wishing it looked like the lobby of the Ritz-Carlton. So, no, I wouldn’t vote for a tax hike there.
As for government services the cops, firemen, trash pickup, etc. has been just peachy for me. No complaints. No need for more taxes.
As for the schools, my oldest son is graduating from Lee this year and headed to college. My yongest kid’s elementary school is doing just fine. As for the money needed to fix Lee? I believe the millions of dollars in the surplus budget could help with that. Not the part that is required to be there, but the *millions* of *extra* dollars that has nothing tagged to it. Why aren’t we using that money? Does anyone know?
13.
Tammy Hebert | May 10, 2008 at 1:30 pm
good question? And the city of Sanford is discussing lowering the property taxes..why not leave it as is and chip in on the high school which is the “city school”
why do we have excess money when there is a definite need for it ?
good question